Approaches to prevent, remove and kill biofilms (2023)

Table of Contents
Abstract introduction sectional cuts Regular disinfection to prevent biofilm Removal and killing of established biofilms Approaches to avoid biofilm formation without destroying microbes Diploma references(38) In vitro resistance to bacterial biofilm formation on coated fluoroplastic ventilation pipes ENT medicine - Head and neck surgery Growth of Listeria monocytogenes as a biofilm on various food surfaces Food Protection Journal Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Pseudomonas biofilms with peracid disinfectants Food Protection Journal Evaluation of central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine for the prevention of bloodstream infections in leukemia patients - a randomized controlled trial Journal of Hospital Infections Effects of different biocides on a mixed biofilm generated on a Tygon tube and on ultrafiltration membranes Spectra 2000 Peroxygen disinfection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on stainless steel discs Biofouling Electrical enhancement of biocidal effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm Applied environmental microbiology A modified chemostat system to study the ecology of oral biofilms Journal of Applied Bacteriology Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobial agents Beilage zum Symposium des Journal of Applied Bacteriology Biofilms and their consequences with particular regard to hygiene in the food industry Journal of Applied Microbiology In vivo efficacy of antimicrobial coated tissue from prosthetic heart valve rings Journal of Heart Valve Disease Changes in biocide susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli cells associated with rapid attachment to plastic surfaces Journal of Applied Microbiology Microbial biofilms from ecology to molecular genetics Reviews of Microbiology and Molecular Biology The effectiveness of the cleaning techniques used in the food industry with regard to the removal of bacterial biofilms Journal of Applied Microbiology In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of covalently linked quaternary ammonium silane coatings on silicone rubber biomaterial Effectiveness of biocides on laboratory-generated Legionella biofilms Letters in Applied Microbiology A laboratory device for generating and testing the biocidal efficacy of legionella biofilms Journal of Applied Bacteriology Evaluation of the anti-biofilm effect of a novel silver citrate/lecithin antibacterial coating in an in vitro test system using a modified Robins apparatus Journal of the Japan Infectious Disease Association A simple in vitro model for growth control of bacterial biofilms Journal of Applied Bacteriology Cited by (207) Industrial background and microbial growth The effectiveness of a typical clean-in-place protocol against in vitro membrane biofilms Structures, properties and applications of zwitterionic polymers Low-energy X-ray irradiation effectively inactivates important biofilms of foodborne pathogens on various food contact surfaces Making Waves: It is time that chemical monitoring of surface water quality lived up to its technical potential Used coffee grounds as a potential green photothermal material for biofilm removal Selected articles (6) Phage-derived lysines as potential biofilm and persister eliminators Which parameters affect biofilm removal by acoustic cavitation? a review Is the combination of drugs with natural remedies a promising therapy for bacterial biofilm infection? Current developments in biofilm therapy: wound and implant infections Prevention of biofilm formation through material modification The effect of EDTA and modified saline to detach and kill cells from Enterococcus faecalis biofilms

Volume 51, booklet 4,

June 2003

, side 249-253

Author links open the overlay panel

Abstract

Biofilm contributes to hygiene problems in the food industry and in the medical field. Biofilms are diverse, and due to the development of specific phenotypes, biofilm organisms are not as susceptible to themBiocidesI am planktonmicroorganisms. Regular disinfection can prevent biofilm. However, since microbial attachment to surfaces and development of biofilm phenotypes is a very rapid process, it is almost impossible to completely prevent biofilm formation. Removal and killing of established biofilms requires harsh treatments, mostly using oxidizing biocides. Depending on the type of biofilm, different biocides may be useful, and the best biocide for a given biofilm has yet to be determined in practical terms. Another approach is to prevent biofilm formation by choosing materials that do not support the attachment of microorganisms. Some materials such as glass and stainless steel show less biofilm formation than others. However, the ranking of the materials depends on the conditions under which they are tested. A new approach is biofilm inhibition by supplementing systems with nutrients to prevent attachment. First results on inhibition of biofouling in the opposite caseOsmosispresented systems.

introduction

Biofilms not only pose a significant hygiene risk in the food industry (Carpentier and Cerf, 1993), but also cause economic losses through technical failures in water systems, cooling towers, heat exchangers, chain lubrication systems and the like. Biofilms also contribute to an increased risk of infection in the medical field by growing on implants, venous or urinary catheters and other medical equipment. Finally, biofilms can affect human health by growing in the oral cavity and promoting tooth decay. Therefore, approaches to prevent, remove and kill biofilms are sought in almost all areas of hygiene.

It is generally accepted that biofilm organisms are more resistant to biocides than the same species in their planktonic form. This is largely due to the development of resistant phenotypes by attachment to surfaces and in the biofilm (Brown and Gilbert, 1993). The term "resistance" is therefore misleading and in this case should be replaced by "phenotypic adaptation". In addition to this phenotypic adaptation, the effect of biocides can be limited by their penetration into the biofilm matrix, the extracellular polymeric material (EPS) and the biocide's chemical reaction with the EPS (“quenching”).

Due to the variety of contributing factors such as surface type, availability of nutrients and oxygen, types of microbes, flow rate of the surrounding fluid, etc., biofilms vary greatly. Experiences from a certain type of biofilm cannot be transferred to other types of biofilm. Essentially, every biofilm is different. Several attempts have been made to find standardized laboratory systems for the generation of artificial biofilms (Bradshaw et al., 1996; Green and Pirrie, 1993; Hodgson et al., 1995; Kinniment et al., 1996; Strathmann et al., 2000). . ; Whitham and Gilbert, 1993). However, to date there is no uniform model that is representative of all biofilms and can therefore be used in general for biocide testing.

sectional cuts

Regular disinfection to prevent biofilm

One strategy to prevent biofilm formation is to disinfect regularly before biofilm formation begins. However, the initial phase of biofilm formation, the attachment of microbes to a surface, is a fairly rapid process lasting only a few hours. Especially in this initial phase, the phenotypic adaptation develops (Das et al., 1998). In many areas of application, e.g. in the food industry, it is hardly possible to disinfect often enough to avoid this first step. In water

Removal and killing of established biofilms

To kill and/or remove biofilm organisms, the biocide must penetrate the EPS and gain access to the microbial cell. Since the chemical composition of EPS varies considerably from biofilm to biofilm, non-specific mechanisms are preferred. Oxidizing agents such as chlorine or peracetic acid are often used. In water treatment, chlorine is more effective in removing itLegionellaBiofilms as non-oxidative biocides such as surface-active quaternary ammonium compounds or biguanides (

Approaches to avoid biofilm formation without destroying microbes

In many engineering processes, microbes do not pose a problem as long as they remain planktonic. In other areas, it would make disinfection easier if the build-up of microbes could be prevented. Several attempts have been made to identify materials that do not promote or even suppress biofilm formation. Schoenen and Schoeber (1983) examined water samples from 15 different water reservoirs made of different materials and of different water quality. Independent of water quality, biofilm

Diploma

There are basically three different strategies for dealing with biofilm problems:

  • Disinfection "in good time" before a biofilm develops.

  • Disinfection of biofilms with aggressive disinfectants.

  • Inhibition of microbial binding by choosing surface materials that do not promote binding or by supplementing with nutrients.

None of these strategies are useful in every case of biofilm problems. The solution will likely be to use the right strategy or mix of strategies for each

references(38)

  • J.A.asket al.

    In vitro resistance to bacterial biofilm formation on coated fluoroplastic ventilation pipes

    ENT medicine - Head and neck surgery

    (2000)

  • I.C.Black manet al.

    Growth of Listeria monocytogenes as a biofilm on various food surfaces

    Food Protection Journal

    (1996)

  • P.Make meet al.

    Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Pseudomonas biofilms with peracid disinfectants

    Food Protection Journal

    (1999)

  • C.logset al.

    Evaluation of central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine for the prevention of bloodstream infections in leukemia patients - a randomized controlled trial

    Journal of Hospital Infections

    (1997)

  • IN.Alasriet al.

    Effects of different biocides on a mixed biofilm generated on a Tygon tube and on ultrafiltration membranes

    Spectra 2000

    (1992)

  • A.P.Blanchardet al.

    Peroxygen disinfection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on stainless steel discs

    Biofouling

    (1998)

  • S.A.Blenkinsopet al.

    Electrical enhancement of biocidal effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm

    Applied environmental microbiology

    (1992)

  • D.J.Bradshawet al.

    A modified chemostat system to study the ecology of oral biofilms

    Journal of Applied Bacteriology

    (1996)

  • M.R.W.Braunet al.

    Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobial agents

    Beilage zum Symposium des Journal of Applied Bacteriology

    (1993)

  • B.Carpenteret al.

    Biofilms and their consequences with particular regard to hygiene in the food industry

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (1993)

  • R.O.Darouicheet al.

    In vivo efficacy of antimicrobial coated tissue from prosthetic heart valve rings

    Journal of Heart Valve Disease

    (1998)

  • J.R.Theet al.

    Changes in biocide susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli cells associated with rapid attachment to plastic surfaces

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (1998)

  • MICH.Daveyet al.

    Microbial biofilms from ecology to molecular genetics

    Reviews of Microbiology and Molecular Biology

    (2000)

  • H.Gibsonet al.

    The effectiveness of the cleaning techniques used in the food industry with regard to the removal of bacterial biofilms

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (1999)

  • B.Gottenboset al.

    In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of covalently linked quaternary ammonium silane coatings on silicone rubber

    biomaterial

    (2001)

  • P.N.Green

    Effectiveness of biocides on laboratory-generated Legionella biofilms

    Letters in Applied Microbiology

    (1993)

  • P.N.Greenet al.

    A laboratory device for generating and testing the biocidal efficacy of legionella biofilms

    Journal of Applied Bacteriology

    (1993)

  • H.Hashimoto

    Evaluation of the anti-biofilm effect of a novel silver citrate/lecithin antibacterial coating in an in vitro test system using a modified Robins apparatus

    Journal of the Japan Infectious Disease Association

    (2001)

  • SPORT.Hodgsonet al.

    A simple in vitro model for growth control of bacterial biofilms

    Journal of Applied Bacteriology

    (1995)

  • Cited by (207)

    • Industrial background and microbial growth

      2023, Antiviral and antimicrobial smart coatings: principles and applications

      The microorganisms attach themselves through the synthesis of extracellular polymeric substances and colonize living and non-living surfaces, causing serious problems for the food, dairy, medical, marine, water, gas and oil industries and municipal facilities. Biocorrosion and biofouling are major problems in various industries. These two destruction mechanisms are closely related to the formation of biofilms on material surfaces. Biofilm formation provides an active platform for diatoms and algae, leading to increased operating and maintenance costs and accelerated degradation of abiotic materials. In addition, biofouling on membranes hinders some industrial membrane-based water treatment and desalination processes such as reverse osmosis, microfiltration, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. Due to the harmful effect of biofilms, there is an urgent need to control the microorganisms in biofilms or to prevent the attachment and formation of biofilms. Eradication of biofilms is difficult because microbial cells in biofilms tend to have higher resistance to disinfectants and antimicrobials compared to biofilms of individual species. Therefore, new strategies are being developed to control and damage biofilms, including bacteriophages, antibiofilm enzymes, natural products, lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins, novel surfaces for biofilm prevention, quorum sensing (QS) inhibitors, and physical treatment. This chapter addresses the problems of biofilms in various industries; common problematic microorganisms involved in biofilm formation, biocorrosion and biofouling; and problematic microbes and reviews a number of recently developed antibiofilm solutions for various industries.

    • The effectiveness of a typical clean-in-place protocol against in vitro membrane biofilms

      2022, Journal of Dairy Science

      This study evaluates the effectiveness of a typical clean-in-place (CIP) protocol against in vitro biofilms on whey reverse osmosis (RO) membranes developed under static conditions. Bacterial isolates obtained from RO membrane biofilms were used to develop single and multispecies biofilms under laboratory conditions. A typical commercial CIP protocol was tested on the 24 h old biofilms and included six sequential treatment steps based on alkali, surfactant, acid, enzyme, another surfactant and a disinfection treatment step. The experiments were performed in 4 replicates and the data were analyzed statistically. The results showed a variation in the resistance of mixed species biofilms to each step of the sequential CIP protocol. While the overall 6-step protocol resulted in a greater reduction, it also resulted in the detection of survivors even after the final disinfection step, reflecting the ineffectiveness of the CIP protocol for complete biofilm removal. Posttreatment counts of 0.71 log after sequential CIP of mixed-species biofilms demonstrated the resistance of biofilm-constitutive microbiota. Biofilms of mixed species that include different genera includingBazillus, Staphylococcus, AndstreptococciThey have been observed to be more resistant than most individual biofilms. However, significantly different resistance patterns were observed in the individual biofilmsBacillusIsolates compared to the other bacterial isolates. All 5 isolates fromBacillusproved to be resistant with survival rates greater than 1.0 log to the sequential CIP protocol tested. Therefore, it can be concluded that the tested CIP protocol had limited effectiveness in cleaning membrane biofilms formed on the whey RO membranes.

    • Structures, properties and applications of zwitterionic polymers

      2022, ChemPhysMater

      Zwitterionic polymers have attracted research attention in recent years due to their unique molecular structures. In the same repeating unit, there are simultaneously positive and negative charges on a pair of cationic and anionic groups; Therefore, zwitterionic polymers have a large dipole moment and numerous charged groups. Although the molecular chain of the zwitterionic polymer can be kept in an electrically neutral state as a whole, the coexistence of the oppositely charged groups gives the polymer extremely high polarity and excellent hydrophilicity. At the same time, the polymer's electricity can be further regulated by the pH and salt ions of the environment, which greatly expands the range of applications in various areas. This review presents various structures of zwitterionic polymers and analyzes the reasons why zwitterionic polymers exhibit pH response, anti-polyelectrolyte effects and superior electrical conductivity. The application areas are also summarized by generalizing the state of research of zwitterionic polymers, including applications in antifouling coatings, drug delivery, wastewater treatment and sensors, etc.

    • Low-energy X-ray irradiation effectively inactivates important biofilms of foodborne pathogens on various food contact surfaces

      2022, Food microbiology

      Human pathogens can develop biofilm structures on various artificial substrates common in the food industry. In this study, we investigated the inactivation efficiency of low-energy X-raysEscherichia coliO157:H7,salmonellaTyphimurium andListeria monocytogenesBiofilm on surfaces in contact with food, including polyvinyl chloride (PVC), stainless steel with finish 2B (STS 2B) and Teflon. The number of viable cells in biofilm on all test pieces was significant (P<0.05) decreased with increasing X-ray dose. Interestingly, different levels of biofilm inactivation were observed in relation to different material surfaces. Teflon showed the lowest D5d values ​​(dose required for a 5 log reduction in cell number) in three groups of coupons, while PVC had higher D values5d values ​​than the other two coupons. The mechanism of the X-ray antibiofilm effect was identified by measuring extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofilms. X-ray irradiation could remove exopolysaccharides, which are a major component of EPS, and the removal rate increased as the irradiation dose increased. The analyzes also confirmed that EPS degradation is strongly related to biofilm inactivation tendencies on different coupon surfaces. This study is the first to show that X-ray irradiation effectively inactivates key biofilms of foodborne pathogens on various food contact surfaces and evaluates their antibiofilm mechanisms to increase safety in the food industry.

    • Making Waves: It is time that chemical monitoring of surface water quality lived up to its technical potential

      2022, water research

      A comprehensive, real-time assessment of surface water chemistry is still a long way off, but we believe it is time to use the dynamics of recent technological, infrastructural and societal developments to move significantly closer to that goal. Procedures such as inline and online analysis (on pageor in the bypass) with near-real-time analysis and data provision are already available in several industries. In contrast, at-line and offline analysis with manual sampling and time-decoupled analysis in the laboratory is still common practice in aqueous environmental monitoring. Automated tools for data analysis, verification and evaluation are changing significantly and becoming more and more powerful with an increasing degree of automation and introduction of self-learning systems. In addition, the amount of available data will most likely increase in the near future through community awareness of water quality and citizen science. In this analysis, we highlight the significant potential of surface water monitoring techniques, present "lighthouse" projects from different sectors, and identify gaps that we need to fill in order to chart a path forward for inland surface water chemical monitoring.

    • Used coffee grounds as a potential green photothermal material for biofilm removal

      2022, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

      In this study, we investigated the possibility of using spent coffee grounds (SCGs) as a photothermal material to kill bacteria. Photothermal materials can convert light energy into thermal energy and are widely used in energy and biomedicine. However, it is still a challenge to produce efficient, cheap, and easy-to-manufacture green photothermal materials using a low-emission, low-cost method. To address this challenge, we propose the use of natural SCGs as photothermal materials to kill planktonic bacteria and remove biofilms. First, SCGs and faded SCGs were exposed to near-infrared (NIR) irradiation to confirm their photothermal effect. The SCGs showed a rapid photothermal effect and reached a temperature of up to 344 °C within 2 min of irradiation, whereas the faded SCGs did not show a rapid photothermal effect because melanoidin aggregates were dissociated in them. Furthermore, the SCGs showed excellent thermal reproducibility and photothermal stability and could be repeatedly heated at least 12 times. Furthermore, the SCGs generated heat upon NIR irradiation, which led them to show excellent photothermal killing effect on planktonic bacteria and even biofilms. The generated heat killed 6 logs of planktonic bacteria and removed more than 90% of the biofilm within 30 minutes. Finally, the SCGs were embedded in a SiO2Coating to achieve repeated in situ photothermal sterilization. This study provides extremely valuable results for the reuse and recycling of SCGs.

    See all citing articles on Scopus

    Selected articles (6)

    • Research Article

      Phage-derived lysines as potential biofilm and persister eliminators

      Drug Discovery Today, Band 23, Ausgabe 4, 2018, S. 848-856

      Bacterial biofilms are extremely resistant to the effects of antibiotics. The presence of persisters, phenotypically resistant populations of bacterial cells, is thought to contribute to biofilm resilience. Phage-derived lysins have the unique ability to kill resting cells due to their ability to enzymatically cleave the peptidoglycan from bacterial cells. Several lysines have shown strong antibiofilm activityin vitro. The fact that lysins have shown better efficacy than conventional drugs in animal models of endocarditis and other biofilm-borne infections suggests that the lysins may be engineered to target difficult-to-treat bacterial infections.

    • Research Article

      Which parameters affect biofilm removal by acoustic cavitation? a review

      Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, bind 45, udgave 5, 2019, s. 1044-1055

      Bacterial biofilms are a source of contamination in numerous medical and biological fields. Ultrasound is mechanical energy that can remove these biofilms through cavitation and acoustic flow, creating shear forces to disrupt the biofilm from a surface. The purpose of this narrative review is to review the literature on mechanical biofilm removal using acoustic cavitation to identify the various operating parameters that affect removal using this method. The properties of the liquid and the properties of the ultrasound greatly influence the type of cavitation that is generated. These include gas content, temperature, surface tension, ultrasonic frequency and sound pressure. For many of these parameters, further research is needed to understand their mechanisms in ultrasonic biofilm removal, and further research will help optimize this method for effective biofilm removal from various surfaces.

    • Research Article

      Is the combination of drugs with natural remedies a promising therapy for bacterial biofilm infection?

      Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, Volume 128, 2020, Article 110184

      Bacterial biofilms are widespread in nature and pose a serious threat to public health worldwide. Biofilms always lead to persistent infections and significantly increase the incidence of antibiotic resistance, making bacterial infections more difficult to treat. Current conventional therapies such as antibiotics, bacteriophage, and quorum-sensing inhibitors are widely used to combat biofilms. However, these therapies are insufficient to safely and effectively treat biofilms. Antibiotics often induce resistance in treated bacteria, and antibacterial peptides are easily degraded by proteases, reducing their effectiveness. These results suggest that biofilm treatment needs to be further improved. There is increasing evidence that naturopathic therapies have significant inhibitory effects on biofilms. In this review, the efficacy characteristics and corresponding mechanisms of conventional and naturopathic biofilm-fighting therapies have been summarized and analyzed. For comparison, the advantages and disadvantages of these therapies were classified and interpreted, leading us to conclude that combined medicine with natural remedies will be a more effective strategy against biofilm. This review lays a promising foundation for the development of antibiofilm drugs and provides new perspectives for the treatment of bacterial biofilm infections.

    • Research Article

      Current developments in biofilm therapy: wound and implant infections

      Engineered Regeneration, Band 1, 2020, S. 64-75

      The formation of biofilms in wounds and implants can have several negative effects on a patient's health, including delayed healing and implant removal. Current treatments for biofilms do not completely eliminate or prevent microbial colonies from forming, so further study is needed. Current research in the treatment of wound and implant biofilm infections focuses on nanotechnology-based drug delivery mechanisms, combination therapies and implant modifications. Ultrasonic debridement and hydrogels as well as new developments in implant modifications have great potential for use in wound and implant treatments. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent developments in biofilm treatment and to understand the direction of current research.

    • Research Article

      Prevention of biofilm formation through material modification

      Biofilms and Implantable Medical Devices, 2017, s. 159-180

      Bacterial colonization represents a current challenge in environmental, industrial and medical applications and can be considered a "global security problem" for humanity. Therefore, much research is devoted to overcoming this deficiency by developing new surfaces or materials or by modifying existing surfaces or materials through chemical and physical methods. This chapter summarizes the most representative possibilities for modifying the surfaces of metals, polymers and ceramics and identifies the new trends and challenges in this field. Special emphasis is placed on chemical surface modification.

    • Research Article

      The effect of EDTA and modified saline to detach and kill cells from Enterococcus faecalis biofilms

      Journal of Endodontics, Band 42, Ausgabe 2, 2016, S. 320–323

      Destruction of the matrix of endodontic biofilms facilitates their removal from a root canal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of EDTA and a modified saline solution (MSS) in detaching bacteria from biofilms.

      48 hours oldEnterococcus faecalisBiofilms were grown on glass coverslips and then treated by immersion in 17% EDTA or MSS for 1 hour. Phosphate buffered saline served as a negative control. Subsequently, the remaining biofilm cells on the substrate and the released cells were collected in the supernatant. Viability was checked by the colony forming unit (CFU) counting method. Treatment with propidium monoazide (PMA) in conjunction with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was also performed to detect the presence of propidium monoazide (PMA).E. faecalis16S ribonucleic acid RNA genes. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey's or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test. Pearson's R test assessed the correlation between CFU and PMA results (α=5%).

      qPCR showed that EDTA detached 99% of biofilm cells and MSS detached 94% of biofilm cells (both).P<.001). Unlike EDTA, MSS was highly antimicrobial. Treatment promoted a strong log-7 reduction in adherent cells (P<.001), and almost no viable cells were detected in the supernatant (P<.001). Positive correlations between CFU and qPCR with PMA were observed (R= 0.959 andR= 0,729).

      EDTA-dissolved cells in biofilms with little antimicrobial activity. In addition to an excellent antimicrobial effect, MSS also loosens biofilm cells. This dispersal of biofilms provides insight into new strategies for endodontic biofilm removal.

    Show full text

    Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Foster Heidenreich CPA

    Last Updated: 24/03/2023

    Views: 5952

    Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

    Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Foster Heidenreich CPA

    Birthday: 1995-01-14

    Address: 55021 Usha Garden, North Larisa, DE 19209

    Phone: +6812240846623

    Job: Corporate Healthcare Strategist

    Hobby: Singing, Listening to music, Rafting, LARPing, Gardening, Quilting, Rappelling

    Introduction: My name is Foster Heidenreich CPA, I am a delightful, quaint, glorious, quaint, faithful, enchanting, fine person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.