price now1432 $ game support100% price now983$ game support100% General information specifications Store References games Vote competitor user rating tips and comments RTX 3080Ti RX7900XT Comparing GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT market type (desktop or laptop), architecture and price and sales start time. Price-performance ratio To get an index, we compare the performance of graphics cards and their costs, taking into account the costs of other graphics cards. GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT general parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak about the performance of GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT, but for accurate assessment, you should consider its benchmark and gaming test results. Information about GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT compatibility with other computer components. It is useful, for example, when you want to select a future computer configuration or update an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, these are the interface and interconnect bus (motherboard compatibility), the physical dimensions of the graphics card (motherboard and chassis compatibility), and additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). food). Memory parameters installed in GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT are its type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. Graphics cards integrated into the processor, which do not have their own memory, will use a shared part of the system RAM. Types and number of video connectors on GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT. As a rule, this section is relevant only for reference desktop video cards, since for notebooks the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model. APIs supported by GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT, sometimes including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance of the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the fastest graphics card currently. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We regularly improve our blended algorithms, but if you find any perceived inconsistencies, please feel free to let us know in the comments section, we usually fix issues quickly. RTX 3080Ti69.11 RX7900XT73,58 +6,5% This is probably the most used benchmark, part of the Passmark PerformanceTest Suite. It thoroughly evaluates the graphics card and offers four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the last one running at 4K resolution when possible), as well as some other tests that touch on DirectCompute's features. Reference coverage: 24% RTX 3080Ti27420 RX7900XT29195 +6,5% A Radeon RX 7900 XT supera a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti em 6% no Passmark. 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one shows a girl escaping from a military base in a sea cave, the other shows a space fleet attacking a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017 and the Time Spy benchmark is now recommended for use. Reference coverage: 16% RTX 3080Ti120236 RX7900XT142489 +18,5 % Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3080 Ti by 19% in 3DMark Vantage performance. 3DMark 11 is an outdated DirectX 11 benchmark from Futuremark. It uses four tests based on two scenes. One is a pair of submarines exploring the wreckage of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests are heavily loaded with mosaic and volumetric lighting and are relatively demanding despite the 1280x720 resolution. 3DMark 11 was discontinued in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy. Reference coverage: 16% RTX 3080Ti60980 RX7900XT75896 +24,5 % Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3080 Ti by 24% in 3DMark 11 GPU performance. Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 Feature Level 10 benchmark used for home PCs and entry-level laptops. It showed some footage of a strange space teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown and used a fixed resolution of 1280x720. Like the Ice Storm benchmark, it was discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Reference coverage: 13% RTX 3080Ti218185 RX7900XT259707 +19% A Radeon RX 7900 XT supera a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti em 19% na GPU 3DMark Cloud Gate. Reference coverage: 13% RTX 3080Ti38629 RX7900XT50669 +31,2 % A Radeon RX 7900 XT supera a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti em 31% no 3DMark Fire Strike Score. Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It contains two separate tests showing a struggle between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. With a resolution of 1920x1080, Fire Strike displays realistic graphics and is quite taxing on the hardware. Reference coverage: 13% RTX 3080Ti47113 RX7900XT63712 +35,2% The Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti by 35% in 3DMark Fire Strike graphics. Ice Storm Graphics is an outdated benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm was used to measure the performance of entry-level Windows-based laptops and tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9 to depict a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. It was discontinued in January 2020 and is now being replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Reference coverage: 8% RTX 3080Ti785365 +6,5% RX7900XT737404 A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti supera a Radeon RX 7900 XT em 7% na GPU 3DMark Ice Storm. Gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second across a large number of popular games at different resolutions: −8,8 % +8,8% −6,2% +6,2 % −2 % +2% −8,2 % +8,2 % −4 % +4% −6,9 % +6,9% −3,1% +3,1% −1,7% +1,7% −15,2% +15,2% +6,1% −6,1% +6,7 % −6,7% −5,9% +5,9 % −2,9% +2,9% −8,6 % +8,6 % −7,6% +7,6 % −25,9% +25,9% −5,2% +5,2 % −4 % +4% −6,9 % +6,9% −3,1% +3,1% −1,7% +1,7% −18,8% +18,8 % +5,9 % −5,9% +6,4% −6,4% −5,9% +5,9 % −59,7% +59,7 % −8,6 % +8,6 % +17,8% −17,8% −127 % +127% −30,5 % +30,5 % −29,8 % +29,8% −5,2% +5,2% −4 % +4% −24% +24% +19,5% −19,5 % −22,6 % +22,6 % +7,5% −7,5 % +2,8% −2,8% −5,9% +5,9 % −46,4% +46,4% −25,8% +25,8% −7 % +7 % +22,8% −22,8% −9,6% +9,6 % −18,4% +18,4% +24% −24% −23,8 % +23,8% −6,8% +6,8% −7 % +7 % +35,2% −35,2% −23,2% +23,2% +1,7% −1,7% +0% +0% −8,1% +8,1 % +7,2 % −7,2% −8,9 % +8,9% +18,8 % −18,8% −11,6 % +11,6% −14,5% +14,5 % +26 % −26% −17 % +17% −4,6% +4,6% −7,4 % +7,4% +3,4 % −3,4% +34,7% −34,7 % −20 % +20% −21,1 % +21,1% −19,4% +19,4% −11,1% +11,1% +18% −18 % technical citycan't come in Geforce RTX 3080Ti e Radeon RX7900 XT to choose. In our opinion, the performance difference is very small. If you still have doubts about choosing between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XT, ask them in the comments section and we will answer them. Do you agree with our opinion or do you think differently? Vote for your favorite graphics card by clicking the "Like" button. Geforce RTX 3080Ti Radeon RX7900 XT I like I like We believe that the competitor to AMD's GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the Radeon RX 6900 XT, which is on average 2% slower and 1 position lower in our ranking list. Compare Here are some of the closest AMD rivals to the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti: Radeon RX7900XTX116,7 Radeon RX7900 XT106,47 Radeon RX6950XT105,98 Geforce RTX 3080Ti100 Radeon RX6900XT98,34 Radeon RX6800XT91.2 Radeon RX680081,41 We believe that the competitor of Radeon RX 7900 XT from NVIDIA company is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, which is on average 2% faster and 1 position higher in our ranking list. Compare Here are some of the closest NVIDIA rivals to the Radeon RX 7900 XT: Geforce RTX 4080121,24 Geforce RTX 4070Ti109,81 Geforce RTX 3090Ti102.36 Radeon RX7900 XT100 Geforce RTX 3080Ti93,92 GeForce RTX309092,28 GeForce RTX 3080 12GB91,9 We've selected several graphics card comparisons that are more or less close in performance to the cards we tested, so that you can consider more likely options. Here you can see user rating of graphics cards and rate them yourself. 28101 votes Rate the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.9514 votes Rate the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about GeForce RTX 3080 Ti or Radeon RX 7900 XT, agree or disagree with our judgments, or report an error or incompatibility. Unable to load Disqus.Content
General information
place in the performance ranking 8 6 Price-performance ratio 17.85 31.02 architecture Ampere(2020-2022) RDNA3 code name Ampere GA102 Navi 31XT Type Workspace- Workspace- release date of September 24, 2020(2 years ago) November 3, 2022(less than a year ago) Price at time of publication 1.199 $ $ 899 price now $1432 (1,2x) $ 983 (1,1x) specifications
Number of shader processors 10240 5376 center frequency 1370MHz not specified increase the frequency 1667MHz 2000MHz number of transistors 28,300 million 57,700 million Technological manufacturing process 8 nm 5 nm Power Consumption (TDP) 350 Watts 315 Watts texturing speed 532,8 804.4 Compatibility and dimensions
interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Lang 285mm 276mm thickness 2-small 2-small Additional power connections 1 x 12 pol 2 x 8 pins Store
storage type GDDR6X GDDR6 Maximum storage capacity 12GB 20GB memory bus width 384 bits 320 bits memory frequency 19000MHz 20000 MHz memory bandwidth 912.4 GB/s 800.0 GB/s multiplex memory - - video outputs
video connections 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Typ-C HDMI + + API support
DirectX 12 finals (12_2) 12 finals (12_2) Shader-Model 6.6 6.7 OpenGLGenericName 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 3.0 2.1 Vulkan 1.2 1.3 AMOR 8.6 not specified Benchmark-Testes
Overall test performance
minimum score
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Cloud Gate-GPU
3DMark Fire-Strike-Score
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Ice Storm-GPU
testing in games
average FPS
Full-HD 216 235 1440p 146 155 4K 98 100 popular games
low preset
medium preset
high preset
ultra preset
high preset
ultra preset
high preset
ultra presetCyberpunk 2077 219 237 Assassin's Creed Odyssee 100−110 100−110 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110-120 120-130 battlefield 5 150-160 160-170 Call of War modern weaponry 170-180 170-180 Cyberpunk 2077 184 212 Far Cry 5 208 196 FarCry New Dawn 174 163 Forza Horizon 4 180-190 190–200 Assassin 3 200−210 210–220 Horizon Zero Dawn 150-160 160-170 Red Dead Redemption 2 110-120 120-130 Tomb Raider Treasures 247 311 Guard Dogs: Legion 110-120 120-130 Assassin's Creed Odyssee 100−110 100−110 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110-120 120-130 battlefield 5 150-160 160-170 Call of War modern weaponry 170-180 170-180 Cyberpunk 2077 160 190 Far Cry 5 198 187 FarCry New Dawn 167 157 Forza Horizon 4 180-190 190–200 Assassin 3 134 210–220 Horizon Zero Dawn 150-160 160-170 Metro-Exodus 172 146 Red Dead Redemption 2 56 120-130 Tomb Raider Treasures 226 295 The Witcher 3: Wilde Jagd 372 483 Guard Dogs: Legion 110-120 120-130 Assassin's Creed Odyssee 100−110 100−110 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100 120-130 battlefield 5 196 160-170 Cyberpunk 2077 146 179 Far Cry 5 186 173 FarCry New Dawn 146 142 Forza Horizon 4 180-190 190–200 The Witcher 3: Wilde Jagd 181 265 Guard Dogs: Legion 97 120-130 Call of War modern weaponry 120-130 130-140 Assassin 3 210 170-180 Horizon Zero Dawn 110-120 120-130 Metro-Exodus 114 135 Red Dead Redemption 2 93 75-80 Tomb Raider Treasures 164 203 Assassin's Creed Odyssee 70-75 75-80 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 86 90-95 battlefield 5 192 140-150 Cyberpunk 2077 99 122 Far Cry 5 176 173 FarCry New Dawn 141 141 Forza Horizon 4 160-170 170-180 Guard Dogs: Legion 89 80-85 Call of War modern weaponry 75-80 85-90 Assassin 3 120 100−110 Horizon Zero Dawn 65-70 75-80 Metro-Exodus 76 87 Red Dead Redemption 2 63 50-55 Tomb Raider Treasures 94 110 The Witcher 3: Wilde Jagd 152 159 Assassin's Creed Odyssee 50-55 55-60 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61 55-60 battlefield 5 136 100−110 Cyberpunk 2077 50 60 Far Cry 5 109 132 FarCry New Dawn 108 129 Forza Horizon 4 110-120 130-140 Guard Dogs: Legion 59 50-55 advantages and disadvantages
performance evaluation 69.11 73,58 news September 24, 2020 November 3, 2022 Cost $ 1199 $ 899 memory bus width 384 320 Number of shader processors 10240 5376 memory bandwidth 912.4 800 technological process 8 nm 5 nm Power Consumption (TDP) 350 Watts 315 Watts Vote
Competitor to AMD's GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
RadeonRX6900XT
NVIDIA Radeon RX 7900 XT Competitor
Geforce RTX3090 se
comparisons
user rating
tips and comments
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs. Radeon RX 7900 XT [in 7 benchmarks] (2023)
(Video) AMD RX 7900 XT vs RTX 3080 Ti | Test in 7 Games
(Video) RX 7900 XTX vs RTX 3080 Ti vs RX 7900 XT vs RTX 3080 | Test in 7 Games
(Video) RX 7900 XT vs RTX 3080 Ti Benchmark Tests
(Video) AMD RX 7900 XT vs RTX 3080 Ti | 16 Games Tested | 1440p and 4K Benchmarks
GeForce RTX3080 Ti vs Radeon RX6900 XT
Radeon RX7900 XT x Radeon RX6950 XT
GeForce RTX3080 Ti x GeForce RTX3090
Videos
1. 3080 vs 4070 Ti vs 7900 XT: The Ultimate Comparison
(Daniel Owen)
2. AMD RX 7900XT vs RTX 3080 Benchmarks, Does it worth upgrade?
(PC Games Benchmarks)
3. RX 7900 XT vs RTX 3090 Ti vs RTX 3080 Ti | Test in 7 Games
(Mark PC)
4. Radeon RX 7900XT vs. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, 50+ Game Benchmark @ 1440p & 4K
(Hardware Unboxed)
5. RTX 3080 vs RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4080 // Test in 7 Games // 4K // Benchmark
(Hardware for Gamers)
6. AMD 7900XT & 7900XTX Review and Benchmarks!
(JayzTwoCents)
References
- https://technical.city/de/video/GeForce-RTX-3080-Ti-vs-Radeon-RX-7900-XT
- https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-3080-vs-Radeon-RX-7900-XT
Top Articles
Tudor Fifty-Eight Heritage Black Bay 79030 REVIEW & Guide – Watches that are thousands of years old
Silver Treasure: Testing the Tudor Black Bay Fifty Eight 925
Two months of life with the Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight Silver
Residence Inn by Marriott Arundel Mills BWI 2023 Airport Reviews, Deals & Photos - Expedia.com
Residence Inn by Marriott Deptford 2023 Reviews, Deals & Photos - Expedia.com
Eu não vou fazer isso?
Seremos a mesma pessoa no céu?
Latest Posts
Amalgamate Meaning In Urdu
Nasolabial Fold Filler Gone Wrong
Avatar Atakan Kaç Kilo
Geographie (BA/B.Sc.) - Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät - Leibniz Universität Hannover
HIPAA – Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women and Babies
Article information
Author: Jonah Leffler
Last Updated: 10/10/2023
Views: 6068
Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)
Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful
Author information
Name: Jonah Leffler
Birthday: 1997-10-27
Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808
Phone: +2611128251586
Job: Mining Supervisor
Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy
Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.