Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (2023)

price now994 $

Supported Games100%

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (3)

nvidiaGeforce RTX 3080

Comparison

  • interfacePCIe 4.0 x16
  • Master clock speed1450
  • Maximum video memory10240
  • storage typeGDDR6X
  • memory clock speed19000
  • maximum resolution

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (4)

Radeon RX7900 XT

Comparison

  • interfacePCIe 4.0 x16
  • Master clock speed
  • Maximum video memory20GB
  • storage typeGDDR6
  • memory clock speed20000
  • maximum resolution

price now983$

Supported Games100%

Contents

General information

Technical specifications

Storage

references

games

cast your vote

competitors

user rating

questions and comments

RTX3080

RX7900XT

General information

Comparing GPU architecture, market segment, price/performance ratio and other general parameters.

place in the performance rating126
ranked by popularity67no data
cost-benefit26.4930,77
ArchitectureAmpere(2020–2022)RDNA3
GPU-CodenameAmpere GA102Navi 31XT
market segmentWorkplaceWorkplace
release date from16.09.2020(2 years old)3. November 2022(less than a year)
Introductory price (RRP)699 $899 $
current price$ 994 (1,4x UVP)$ 983 (1,1x UVP)

cost-benefit

performance/price ratio. The higher the better.

Technical specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, base clock of the GPU core and increased clock rates, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for an accurate assessment, you should consider your benchmark and gaming test results. Note that the power consumption of some graphics cards can exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

CUDA Pipelines/Core87045376
Master clock speed1450 MHzno data
Increase clock frequency1710MHz2000 MHz
number of transistors28,300 million57,700 million
manufacturing process engineering8 nm5 nm
Thermal Design Performance (TDP)320 Watt315 Watt
texture fill rate465,1804.4

Dimensions and Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, these are interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connections (power supply compatibility).

interfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Long285mm276mm
Broad2 slots2 slots
Additional power connections1 x 12-pin2 x 8 pins

Storage

Installed VRAM parameters: type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs do not have dedicated VRAM and use a shared portion of system RAM.

storage typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum amount of RAM10 GB20GB
Width of the memory bus320 Bit320 Bit
memory clock speed19000MHz20000MHz
memory bandwidth760.3 GB/s800.0 GB/s
shared memory--

Video outputs and connections

Types and number of video connectors present on the analyzed GPUs. As a rule, the data in this section is only accurate for desktop references (called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers can change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards the availability of specific video output ports depends on the laptop model and not the card itself.

display connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB tipo C
HDMI++

API support

Supported APIs, including specific versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 Finale (12_2)12 Finale (12_2)
Shader-Modell6.56.7
OpenGLGenericName4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
LOVE8.5no data

benchmark performance

Benchmark performance comparison without games. Note that the overall benchmark performance is measured in points between 0 and 100.

total score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We regularly improve our matching algorithms, but if you find any noticeable inconsistencies, please feel free to report them in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

  • password
  • 3DMark Vantage performance
  • 3DMark 11 performance GPU
  • GPU 3DMark Cloud Gate
  • 3DMark Fire Attack Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • GPU Tempestade de Gelo 3DMark

password

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of the Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a full assessment under different loads, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last one is run at 4K resolution whenever possible) and a few more tests using DirectCompute capabilities.

Reference coverage: 24%

RTX308025411

RX7900XT29107

+14,5%

A Radeon RX 7900 XT supera a GeForce RTX 3080 in 15% no passmark.

3DMark Vantage performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark with a screen resolution of 1280x1024. It overloads the graphics card with two scenes, one shows a girl escaping from a militarized base in a sea cave, the other shows a space fleet attacking a defenseless one planets. It was discontinued in April 2017, and it's now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.

Reference coverage: 16%

RTX308091747

RX7900XT142489

+55,3%

A Radeon RX 7900 XT supera a GeForce RTX 3080 in 55% no 3DMark Vantage performance.

3DMark 11 performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an outdated DirectX 11 benchmark from Futuremark. He used four tests based on two scenes, one being some submarines exploring the underwater wreckage of a sunken ship and the other an abandoned temple in the middle of the jungle. All of the tests are packed with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and while they're run at 1280x720 resolution, they're relatively taxing. 3DMark 11 was discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by Time Spy.

Reference coverage: 16%

RTX308053713

RX7900XT75896

+41,3%

A Radeon RX 7900 XT Super a GeForce RTX 3080 with 41% GPU 3DMark 11 performance.

GPU 3DMark Cloud Gate

Cloud Gate is a legacy DirectX 11 Feature Level 10 benchmark used for home PCs and entry-level laptops. It shows some footage of a strange space teleportation device sending spaceships into the unknown, with a fixed resolution of 1280x720. Like the Ice Storm benchmark, it was discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Reference coverage: 13%

RTX3080188064

RX7900XT259707

+38,1%

A Radeon RX 7900 XT Super a GeForce RTX 3080 with 38% GPU 3DMark Cloud Gate.

3DMark Fire Attack Score

Reference coverage: 13%

RTX308031709

RX7900XT50669

+59,8%

A Radeon RX 7900 XT supera a GeForce RTX 3080 with 60% no 3DMark Fire Strike score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It contains two separate tests depicting a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. With a resolution of 1920 x 1080, Fire Strike displays some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on the hardware.

Reference coverage: 13%

RTX308039257

RX7900XT63712

+62,3%

The Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms the GeForce RTX 3080 by 62% in 3DMark Fire Strike graphics.

GPU Tempestade de Gelo 3DMark

Ice Storm Graphics is an outdated benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm was used to measure the performance of entry-level Windows-based laptops and tablets. It uses DirectX 11 Feature Level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. It was discontinued in January 2020 and is now being replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Reference coverage: 8%

RTX3080529548

RX7900XT737404

+39,3%

A Radeon RX 7900 XT Super a GeForce RTX 3080 with 39% GPU 3DMark Ice Storm.

game performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are in gaming. Game-specific benchmark scores are measured in FPS.

average FPS

Here are the average frames per second for a large number of popular games at different resolutions:

FullHD165

−42,4 %

235

+42,4%

1440p124

−25 %

155

+25 %

4K87

−14,9 %

100

+14,9%

popular games

  • FullHD
    low preset
  • FullHD
    medium preset
  • FullHD
    high preset
  • FullHD
    Ultra preset
  • 1440p
    high preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra preset
  • 4K
    high preset
  • 4K
    Ultra preset
Cyberpunk 2077120-130

−94,3 %

237

+94,3%

Assassin's Creed Odyssee95-100

-9,4%

100−110

+9,4%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla111

−10,8 %

120-130

+10,8%

battlefield 5172

+4,9%

160-170

-4,9%

Call of War modern weapons160-170

−6 %

170-180

+6 %

Cyberpunk 2077138

−53,6 %

212

+53,6%

Far Cry 5157

−24,8 %

196

+24,8%

FarCry New Dawn129

−26,4 %

163

+26,4%

Forza Horizon 4170-180

−11,9 %

190-200

+11,9%

assassin 3172

−23,8 %

210–220

+23,8%

Horizon Zero Dawn166

+2,5%

160-170

−2,5 %

Red Dead Redemption 2152

+20,6%

120-130

−20,6 %

Treasures of the Tomb Raiders194

−60,3 %

311

+60,3%

Guard Dogs: Legion134

+9,8%

120-130

−9,8 %

Assassin's Creed Odyssee95-100

-9,4%

100−110

+9,4%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla96

−28,1 %

120-130

+28,1%

battlefield 5156

−5,1 %

160-170

+5,1%

Call of War modern weapons160-170

−6 %

170-180

+6 %

Cyberpunk 2077134

−41,8 %

190

+41,8%

Far Cry 5150

−24,7 %

187

+24,7%

FarCry New Dawn124

−26,6 %

157

+26,6%

Forza Horizon 4170-180

−11,9 %

190-200

+11,9%

assassin 3167

−27,5 %

210–220

+27,5%

Horizont Zero Dawn149

-8,7%

160-170

+8,7%

Metro-Exodus128

−14,1 %

146

+14,1%

Red Dead Redemption 2119

−5,9 %

120-130

+5,9%

Treasures of the Tomb Raiders187

−57,8 %

295

+57,8%

The Witcher 3: Wilde Jagd303

−59,4 %

483

+59,4%

Guard Dogs: Legion119

−2,5 %

120-130

+2,5%

Assassin's Creed Odyssee95-100

-9,4%

100−110

+9,4%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla88

−39,8 %

120-130

+39,8%

battlefield 5145

−13,1 %

160-170

+13,1%

Cyberpunk 2077131

−36,6 %

179

+36,6%

Far Cry 5140

−23,6 %

173

+23,6%

FarCry New Dawn112

−26,8 %

142

+26,8%

Forza Horizon 4170-180

−11,9 %

190-200

+11,9%

The Witcher 3: Wilde Jagd149

−77,9 %

265

+77,9%

Guard Dogs: Legion101

−20,8 %

120-130

+20,8%

Call of War modern weapons110-120

−16,1 %

130-140

+16,1%

assassin 3164

−3 %

160-170

+3%

Horizont Zero Dawn131

+4,8%

120-130

−4,8 %

Metro-Exodus95

−42,1 %

135

+42,1%

Red Dead Redemption 284

+12 %

75-80

−12 %

Treasures of the Tomb Raiders150

−35,3 %

203

+35,3%

Assassin's Creed Odyssee65-70

−14,5 %

75-80

+14,5%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla76

−19,7 %

90-95

+19,7%

battlefield 5124

−13,7 %

140-150

+13,7%

Cyberpunk 207786

−41,9 %

122

+41,9%

Far Cry 5135

−28,1 %

173

+28,1%

FarCry New Dawn107

−31,8 %

141

+31,8%

Forza Horizon 4140-150

−16,3 %

170-180

+16,3%

Guard Dogs: Legion81

−2,5 %

80-85

+2,5%

Call of War modern weapons70-75

−19,4 %

85-90

+19,4%

assassin 3109

+9 %

100-105

−9 %

Horizont Zero Dawn89

+17,1%

75-80

−17,1 %

Metro-Exodus65

−33,8 %

87

+33,8%

Red Dead Redemption 256

+14,3%

45-50

−14,3 %

Treasures of the Tomb Raiders86

−27,9 %

110

+27,9%

The Witcher 3: Wilde Jagd115

−38,3 %

159

+38,3%

Assassin's Creed Odyssee45-50

−16,3 %

55-60

+16,3%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla52

−13,5 %

55-60

+13,5%

battlefield 591

-9,9%

100-105

+9,9%

Cyberpunk 207743

−39,5 %

60

+39,5%

Far Cry 594

−40,4 %

132

+40,4%

FarCry New Dawn89

−44,9 %

129

+44,9%

Forza Horizon 4100−110

−21,9 %

120-130

+21,9%

Guard Dogs: Legion54

+10,2%

45-50

−10,2 %

advantages and disadvantages

performance evaluation64,3273,68
currently16.09.20203. November 2022
Cost699 $899 $
CUDA Pipelines/Core87045376
memory bandwidth760,3800
Chip-Lithography8 nm5 nm
Thermal Design Performance (TDP)320 Watt315 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests,technical cityrecommends

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (7)

Radeon RX7900 XT

because things are going better.

If you still have questions about choosing between the tested GPUs, ask them in the comments section and we will answer them.

cast your vote

Do you think we are right or wrong in our choice? Vote by clicking the Like button next to your preferred graphics card.

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (8)

Geforce RTX 3080

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (9)

Radeon RX7900 XT

If

If

AMD's GeForce RTX 3080 competitors

According to our data, the closest equivalent to AMD's GeForce RTX 3080 is the Radeon RX 6800 XT, which is 2% slower and 1 position lower in our ranking.

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (10)RadeonRX6800XT

Compare

Here are some AMD competitors that are closest to the GeForce RTX 3080:

Radeon RX7900 XT114,55

Radeon RX6950XT114.26

Radeon RX6900XT106.03

Geforce RTX 3080100

Radeon RX6800XT98,13

Generation RTX 6000 Ada97,62

Radeon RX680087,64

Competitors to NVIDIA's Radeon RX 7900 XT

The closest NVIDIA equivalent to the Radeon RX 7900 XT is the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, which is 3% faster and 1 higher in our performance ranking.

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (11)Geforce RTX3090 Se

Compare

Here are some NVIDIA competitors that are closest to the Radeon RX 7900 XT:

Geforce RTX 4080121,53

Geforce RTX 4070 Ti109,45

Geforce RTX 3090 Ti102,67

Radeon RX7900 XT100

Geforce RTX 3080Ti94,2

GeForce RTX309092,55

GeForce RTX3080 12GB92.06

Similar GPU comparisons

We've selected several graphics card comparisons that are similar to those tested, giving you more options to consider.

GeForce RTX3080 vs Radeon RX6800 XT
Radeon RX7900 XT vs Radeon RX6950 XT
GeForce RTX3080 x GeForce RTX3080 12GB

user rating

Here you can see user reviews of graphics cards and rate them yourself.

4.12649 votes

Rate the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (18)

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (19)

3.9482 votes

Rate the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (20)

Radeon RX 7900 XT versus GeForce RTX 3080 [in 7 reference points] (21)

questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or incompatibility.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kelle Weber

Last Updated: 04/01/2024

Views: 5590

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kelle Weber

Birthday: 2000-08-05

Address: 6796 Juan Square, Markfort, MN 58988

Phone: +8215934114615

Job: Hospitality Director

Hobby: tabletop games, Foreign language learning, Leather crafting, Horseback riding, Swimming, Knapping, Handball

Introduction: My name is Kelle Weber, I am a magnificent, enchanting, fair, joyous, light, determined, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.